Directors with two DINs

Those Directors who have taken more than one DIN either knowingly or in advertently are in for a huge setback. The KYC is going through for one DIN, but huge problem if you try to do KYC for the second DIN. As per MCA rules, if you have two DIN, then you have to surrender the latter one, for which a form DIR-5 has to be filed. Now if you try to file DIR-5 without doing the KYC, then system is not accepting stating that the DINs have been de-activated. If you somehow do the KYC of one DIN, then doing the KYC for the second DIN becomes a huge problem. The passport no. & aadhar no. is linked to the first DIN, so the system is rejecting if we mention these details. We cannot say that the incumbent does not have a passport or an aadhar because that is tantamount to making a wrong statement. It is a total quandary. MCA has tied itself in knots because of this issue. It is not user friendly or business friendly at all. People make mistakes, even business persons make mistakes at times, but there should be an amicable solution to all the human errors. Compliance is being sought to be done by surrendering the latter DIN, but the system is so rigid that it has become impossible to comply.