Buy-back Amendment Regulations 2026

 Notification No.: SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2026/306

Date of Notification: 1 July 2026
Effective Date: 1 August 2026

---

Executive Summary

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has introduced significant amendments to the SEBI (Buy-Back of Securities) Regulations, 2018. These amendments are aimed at making the buy-back process more transparent, time-bound and compliance-driven while reducing unnecessary regulatory costs for listed companies.

The most noteworthy reform is the introduction of an optional merchant banker regime, whereby companies are no longer mandatorily required to appoint a merchant banker for buy-backs. Instead, specified responsibilities have been redistributed among the company, secretarial auditor, statutory auditor, compliance officer and stock exchanges.

The amendments also tighten governance requirements relating to:

• Open market buy-backs
• Minimum public shareholding
• Timelines
• Escrow arrangements
• Promoter share freeze
• Shareholder communication
• Buy-back disclosures

Overall, these amendments shift greater responsibility directly onto the company and its professional advisers.

---

Key Regulatory Changes

1. Merchant Banker Appointment becomes Optional

This is the single biggest change introduced.

Earlier:

• Appointment of a Merchant Banker was mandatory.

Now:

A company may decide not to appoint a Merchant Banker while undertaking a buy-back.

However, the responsibilities earlier discharged by the Merchant Banker must now be allocated among various professionals.

Allocation of Responsibilities

Responsibility	Assigned To
Letter of Offer & Public Announcement	Company
Due Diligence Certificate	Secretarial Auditor
Escrow Monitoring	Statutory Auditor
VWAP Certification	Stock Exchange
Extinguishment Supervision	Compliance Officer
Compliance Certification	Compliance Officer
Final Report	Company
Fund Availability	Company
Companies Act Compliance	Company

Practical Impact

This amendment substantially reduces transaction costs but increases the compliance burden on:

• Company Secretary
• Secretarial Auditor
• Statutory Auditor
• Compliance Officer
• Board of Directors

---

2. Restriction on Open Market Buy-back Size

From 1 August 2026,

Open market buy-backs through the stock exchange cannot exceed 15% of the paid-up capital and free reserves, computed based on both standalone and consolidated financial statements.

Impact

Companies planning large buy-backs may need to consider the tender offer route where the proposed size exceeds this threshold.

---

3. Buy-back Cannot Reduce Minimum Public Shareholding

A new restriction has been inserted prohibiting companies from undertaking a buy-back if it results in a breach of the Minimum Public Shareholding (MPS) requirements prescribed under:

• Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957
• SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015

Impact

Companies must evaluate post-buy-back shareholding patterns before approving the proposal.

---

4. Revised Cooling-off Period

The amended regulations now provide that a company cannot undertake another buy-back until the period prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013 has elapsed from the closure of the previous buy-back.

---

5. Faster Public Announcement

Public announcement must now be made:

• within two working days
• after Board Resolution or declaration of postal ballot results.

Earlier timelines were comparatively less stringent.

---

6. Mandatory Electronic Communication

Within one working day of the public announcement,

the company must electronically intimate all shareholders holding shares on the date of the public announcement regarding the open market buy-back.

Objective

Improves transparency and shareholder awareness.

---

7. Time-bound Buy-back Process

For Open Market Buy-back:

• Offer opens within 4 working days
• Offer closes within 66 working days from opening.

This provides certainty and reduces prolonged buy-back programmes.

---

8. Promoter Share Freeze

A completely new compliance requirement.

Promoter and Promoter Group holdings will remain frozen (ISIN level freeze):

• from Board Resolution/Special Resolution
• until closure of buy-back.

Exception:

Tender offer buy-back.

Transfers arising from invocation of prior encumbrances may be permitted subject to SEBI conditions.

Objective

Prevent promoter manipulation during the buy-back period.

---

9. Strengthening Escrow Mechanism

The amendments also tighten escrow requirements:

• Bank Guarantee must remain valid for 30 working days after completion of obligations
• Merchant Banker (where appointed) returns guarantee only after all obligations are fulfilled.

---

10. Various Drafting and Procedural Changes

Numerous amendments are editorial in nature:

• clarification of terminology
• substitution of words
• grammatical corrections
• improved drafting consistency
• removal of obsolete explanations
• alignment of language throughout the Regulations.

These changes do not materially alter legal obligations but improve interpretational clarity.

---

Compliance Implications

The amendments significantly increase responsibility on listed companies.

Boards should now ensure:

• Buy-back eligibility is verified at the planning stage.
• MPS is not violated.
• Post-buy-back capital structure is reviewed.
• Internal compliance mechanisms are strengthened.
• Secretarial Auditor is actively involved.
• Compliance Officer assumes expanded responsibilities.
• Adequate documentary evidence is maintained.

---

Implications for Company Secretaries

These amendments substantially enhance the role of Company Secretaries and Secretarial Auditors.

Key areas requiring attention include:

• Due diligence certification
• Public announcement compliance
• Timeline monitoring
• Coordination with statutory auditors
• Shareholder communications
• Regulatory filings
• Compliance certification
• Coordination with depositories for promoter share freeze
• Documentation for Board decisions

For listed companies that choose not to appoint a Merchant Banker, the Company Secretary will play a central coordinating role.

---

Advantages of the Amendments

The amendments offer several benefits:

• Reduced compliance costs where a merchant banker is not appointed.
• Faster execution of buy-backs through defined timelines.
• Greater transparency through mandatory shareholder communication.
• Improved investor protection by preserving minimum public shareholding.
• Enhanced governance via promoter share freeze.
• Clear allocation of responsibilities among professionals.

---

Potential Challenges

Companies may face practical challenges such as:

• Increased liability on internal compliance teams.
• Greater responsibility on Secretarial Auditors and Compliance Officers.
• Need for stronger internal controls and documentation.
• Higher litigation and enforcement risk in case of procedural lapses.
• Additional coordination among auditors, compliance officers, depositories and stock exchanges.

---

Conclusion

The SEBI (Buy-Back of Securities) (Amendment) Regulations, 2026 represent a significant shift from a merchant banker-centric compliance model to one based on distributed accountability. While the amendments reduce execution costs and streamline the buy-back process, they also impose greater governance and compliance obligations on listed companies and their professional advisers.

For corporate management, boards, company secretaries and compliance professionals, these changes necessitate a thorough review of existing buy-back policies, internal control frameworks and standard operating procedures before the amendments take effect on 1 August 2026. Proper planning, robust documentation and close coordination among the company, auditors, compliance officers and depositories will be critical to ensuring seamless compliance under the revised regulatory framework.

Give It Up

 Some albums arrive amidst a blaze of publicity, trumpeting their significance with calculated fanfare. Others insinuate themselves into one's consciousness with such effortless grace that their greatness is recognised only in retrospect. Give It Up, Bonnie Raitt's second studio album, released in 1972, belongs emphatically to the latter category. It is one of those increasingly uncommon records that unfolds with unhurried confidence, as though a group of gifted musicians had simply gathered in a room to play the music they cherished, blissfully indifferent to commercial imperatives or the tyranny of the charts. The result is an album of extraordinary warmth, unaffected honesty, and enduring artistic beauty.

Although Raitt would ascend to international superstardom nearly two decades later with Nick of Time, Give It Up demonstrates that her artistic identity had already attained remarkable maturity. Here she weaves together blues, folk, rhythm and blues, country, gospel, and soft rock with such natural fluency that the boundaries between genres dissolve almost imperceptibly. Nothing appears contrived or self-conscious; every influence emerges organically from her expressive voice, exquisite slide-guitar work, and profoundly intuitive musicianship. Rather than dazzling through ostentatious virtuosity, Raitt captivates through sincerity, emotional intelligence, and an authenticity that cannot be manufactured.

The album opens magnificently with "Give It Up or Let Me Go," among the finest compositions of Raitt's career. Commencing with earthy slide guitar before blossoming into an exuberant brass arrangement evocative of a jubilant New Orleans street parade, the song radiates infectious vitality. Beneath its playful exuberance lies an admirably forthright message: love demands candour rather than equivocation, commitment rather than perpetual indecision. More than half a century after its release, it retains every ounce of its irresistible charm.

The atmosphere then shifts gracefully with "Nothing Seems to Matter," a tender and deeply introspective composition penned by Raitt herself. Possessing the intimacy of a private confession, the song allows her voice to communicate vulnerability with remarkable restraint, never once descending into sentimentality or melodrama. It exemplifies one of her rarest gifts—the ability to render emotional complexity with such effortless naturalness that profound feeling seems almost conversational.

Among the album's most inspired interpretations is "I Know," originally written by Barbara George. Raitt transforms this rhythm-and-blues classic into something simultaneously soulful and deeply intimate. Rather than overwhelming the composition with vocal embellishment, she inhabits it completely, lending every phrase the quiet authority of lived experience. It is less a cover than a subtle act of artistic reinvention.

"Love Me Like a Man," written by Chris Smither, would deservedly become one of Raitt's signature songs. By deftly modifying the lyrics to reflect a woman's perspective, she transforms the piece into a quietly radical affirmation of emotional equality and mutual respect. The performance brims with confidence yet remains entirely devoid of stridency, illustrating how conviction can possess infinitely greater persuasive power than mere volume.

The haunting "Too Long at the Fair" provides one of the album's emotional summits. Delicate, wistful, and quietly devastating, it meditates upon lost opportunities, fading dreams, and the melancholy awareness of time's inexorable passage. Raitt's restrained vocal interpretation refuses theatrical displays of anguish, allowing the song's bittersweet reflections to resonate long after the final note has faded into silence.

Another gem is "Under the Falling Sky," written by the then-emerging Jackson Browne. Capturing the youthful optimism and quiet uncertainty that characterised the early-1970s singer-songwriter movement, the song cloaks its emotional restlessness beneath an atmosphere of relaxed ease. Raitt understands precisely this delicate emotional balance, conveying both hope and unease with remarkable subtlety.

The album's reverence for traditional blues finds eloquent expression in "You Got to Know How." Here Raitt pays affectionate tribute to the musicians who shaped the genre without lapsing into imitation or nostalgia. Throughout Give It Up, she approaches these songs not as museum exhibits preserved beneath glass but as vibrant, living works capable of continual renewal through heartfelt performance.

"You Told Me Baby," another Raitt original, injects a welcome surge of rhythmic vitality. Buoyant, playful, and melodically engaging, it further confirms that she was already a songwriter of considerable accomplishment, complementing her well-established reputation as one of popular music's most perceptive interpreters.

The album concludes with "Love Has No Pride," the heartbreaking ballad by Eric Kaz and Libby Titus that stands as its emotional centrepiece. Few performances in Raitt's catalogue illustrate her extraordinary interpretative gifts more completely. She sings not with theatrical despair but with quiet resignation, capturing the painful dignity of recognising that love may endure long after a relationship has quietly slipped beyond redemption. It is a performance of breathtaking emotional honesty.

One of Give It Up's most remarkable achievements is its unwavering consistency. There are no transparent attempts to engineer radio-friendly hits, no perfunctory compositions inserted merely to fill running time. Every track contributes meaningfully to the album's atmosphere of relaxed intimacy, rewarding listeners who experience it as a complete artistic statement rather than a mere collection of individual songs.

The production deserves equal admiration. It achieves that elusive balance between polish and spontaneity, remaining impeccably clear without ever becoming antiseptic. The supporting musicians enrich every arrangement with understated elegance while instinctively recognising that their highest purpose is to illuminate, rather than eclipse, Raitt's singular artistry. Every instrumental flourish serves the songs, and every song serves the emotional truth at the heart of the album.

Listening today, Give It Up possesses a timelessness that seems increasingly rare in contemporary popular music. Audiences accustomed to meticulously engineered, digitally perfected productions may find its unaffected simplicity almost revelatory. There is an unmistakable humanity embedded within these performances: every note bears the imprint of human hands, every lyric carries the unmistakable conviction of genuine experience rather than commercial calculation. It is music that breathes naturally, inviting listeners not merely to hear it but to inhabit it.

While Bonnie Raitt's later albums would bring her deserved commercial triumph and multiple Grammy Awards, Give It Up remains among the purest and most illuminating expressions of her artistic vision. It captures an exceptional musician before superstardom altered the landscape around her, when the sole ambition appears to have been the creation of music that was truthful, generous, and profoundly humane. More than fifty years after its release, it continues to reward attentive listeners with its grace, warmth, quiet emotional resonance, and unwavering integrity. It is not merely an excellent album; it is a reminder that the most enduring music seldom clamours for attention—it simply earns a permanent place in the listener's heart.

A Man Alone

This post is written in Aari, a South Omotic language, spoken in the North Omo zone of the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' region of southern Ethiopia. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“A Man Alone” Ray Milland nénna dírektorna wóóshó. Naa film biza “Western” gútta amerika giyó hanáhó, ikkáta wóórra. Film neni máálga shóówa, shásho wóórra wóóshó, nna gashó díra yemmáta.

Wes Steele (Ray Milland) neni shóówa wóórra. Afo stagecoach wóóshó, gakkó buuta mánni, gizo bára nashátta. Town giyo afírra, Steele wóórra shaashó mannó, gasho shaawá. Town mánni wóórraní, kórra nni, gashó Steele shaashó mannó. Steele neni sheriff (Ward Bond) wóóra gótti giyo. Sheriff doo kátto, Steele gashó mannó neni banker Raymond Burr wóóra, neni kórroní.

Film neni shóówa: Steele bizzí wóórra, afírra shaashó mannó, gashó díra dígita. Neni bára shaashó mannó, gashó shaashó mannó shásho kórra, díra biza gútta.

Ray Milland Wes Steele wóóra, shóówa gashó. Steele neni dígita wóórra, neni gashó hárro. Ward Bond sheriff wóóra, kátto mannó, ikkáta wóórra. Mary Murphy sheriff sára Nadine wóóra, Steele wóóra díra hárro, gashó dógga. Raymond Burr banker wóóra, shaashó mannó, town giyo shaashó.

Film neni shóówa: Steele shásho mannó, gashó dígita, town neni shaashó mannó kórroní. Sheriff kátto, town shaashó mannó kórroní. Steele bára shaashó mannó, gashó town giyo gashó.

Film wóóshó bizzí. Desert giyo Steele shaashó mannó, town giyo shaashó mannó kórroní. Roy Webb giyo music neni shaashó giyó.

Film neni Ray Milland dírektor wóóshó. Film bizzí shóówa, ikkáta wóórra, gashó díra shásho. Film neni bára shóówa, Steele wóórra díra shaashó mannó, gashó dígita giyo.

BRSR reporting

 SEBI has vide its circular dated 20th December, 2024 stipulated that the BRSR (Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting) shall follow the industry standards as laid down by the three main industry chambers i.e. Assocham, CII & FICCI under the aegis of the stock exchanges. 

This applies to financial year 2024-25 onwards. 

The listed companies have to comply with the industry standards while reporting the BRSR in their entities. 

RBI penalty on Manappuram Finance

 The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated December 16, 2024, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakh only) on Manappuram Finance Limited (the company) for non-compliance with certain provisions of “Reserve Bank of India (Know Your Customer (KYC)) Direction, 2016” issued by RBI. 

The statutory inspection of the company was conducted by RBI with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2023. Based on supervisory findings of non-compliance with RBI directions and related correspondence in that regard, a notice was issued to the company advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said directions.

After considering the company’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made by it during the personal hearing, RBI found that the following charges against the company were sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty:

1. It failed to undertake verification of PAN of customers from verification facility of the issuing authority at the time of customer acceptance; and

2. It allotted multiple identification codes to certain customers instead of a Unique Customer Identification Code (UCIC) for each customer.

RBI penalty on IndusInd Bank

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated December 18, 2024, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹27.30 lakh (Rupees Twenty-Seven Lakh and Thirty Thousand only) on IndusInd Bank Ltd. (the bank) for non-compliance with certain provisions of ‘Reserve Bank of India (Interest Rate on Deposits) Directions, 2016’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers conferred on RBI under the provisions of Section 47A(1)(c) read with Section 46(4)(i) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The Statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (ISE 2023) of the bank was conducted by RBI with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2023. Based on supervisory findings of non-compliance with RBI directions and related correspondence in that regard, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said directions.

After considering the bank’s reply to the notice, additional submissions made by it and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, RBI found, inter alia, that the charge pertaining to opening of certain savings deposit accounts in the name of ineligible entities was sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty.

The action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transactions or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers. Further, imposition of monetary penalty is without prejudice to any other action that may be initiated by RBI against the bank.

Blogger's Note

RBI should give detailed adjudication order wherein all the facts are brought out as to the non compliance with specific pointers to the RBI directions or notifications not complied with. Just mentioning certain provisions ofo RBI directions is not enough. 

BRSR - Ease of doing business

 Decisions taken by SEBI at its Board meeting held on 18th December, 2024

Ease of doing business with respect to Business Responsibility and Sustainability Report (BRSR)

With a view to facilitate ease of doing business for listed entities and their value chain partners with regard to requirements under BRSR on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosures and its assurance, and introduction of voluntary disclosure on green credits, the Board approved the following:

1 Deferring ESG disclosures for value chain, as well as “assessment or assurance” thereof, by one year. Hence, ESG disclosures for value chain shall apply from FY 2025-26 (as against the current requirement of FY 2024-25) and “assessment or assurance” thereof shall be applicable from FY 2026-27 (as against the current requirement of FY 2025-26).

2 Providing ESG disclosures for value chain shall be “voluntary”, instead of the present requirement of ‘comply-and-explain’.

3 Reducing the scope of value chain to cover the top upstream and downstream partners of a listed entity, individually comprising 2% or more of the listed entity's purchases and sales (by value), respectively, while providing that the listed entity may limit disclosure of value chain to cover 75% of its purchases and sales (by value), respectively.

4 Reporting of previous year numbers will be voluntary in case of first year of reporting of ESG disclosures for value chain.

5 Introduction of a leadership indicator in Principle 6 of BRSR for disclosure of Green Credits generated or procured by the listed entity and its top-10 value chain partners.

6 Substitution of “assurance” with “assessment or assurance” in SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, regarding BRSR. “Assessment” will be third-party assessment undertaken as per standards to be developed by the Industry Standards Forum (ISF) in consultation with SEBI. This would be applicable for BRSR Core disclosures for listed entities and value chain from FY 2024-25 and FY 2026-27 onwards, respectively.

SEBI would come out with a notification to bring all these into effect.