Showing posts with label lending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lending. Show all posts

Monday, 27 July 2026

RBI (Commercial Banks – Credit Facilities) Fifth Amendment Directions, 2026

 The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), through its notification dated 15 July 2026, has issued the RBI (Commercial Banks – Credit Facilities) Fifth Amendment Directions, 2026, amending the RBI (Commercial Banks – Credit Facilities) Directions, 2025. The amendment has been issued under Sections 21 and 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and comes into force with immediate effect.

1. Financing of Projects Capable of Being Operationalised as Multiple Independent Units

The amendment inserts an Explanation to paragraph 78 of the principal Directions. Where a project can be operationalised as multiple independent and viable units, a bank may, at its discretion, finance these independent units as separate projects, each having its own financial closure.

However, an important safeguard has been prescribed: each individual unit must be appraised ex-ante for standalone viability.

2. Implications for Project Finance

This amendment provides greater flexibility to banks in structuring and financing large projects that can be divided into independently viable components.

The provision could be particularly relevant where a project consists of several discrete units that can be commissioned and operated independently. Instead of necessarily treating the entire project as a single financing proposition, banks now have the discretion to consider individual viable units as separate projects, subject to separate financial closure and prior assessment of their standalone viability.

From a credit appraisal perspective, the amendment potentially enables:

  • Phased financing of large projects;
  • More focused assessment of individual project units;
  • Financing structures aligned with the actual commissioning schedule;
  • Potentially more efficient deployment of bank credit; and
  • Greater flexibility in dealing with projects involving multiple independently viable components.

However, the requirement for ex-ante appraisal of standalone viability is significant. The amendment should not be interpreted as permitting banks to arbitrarily divide an otherwise integrated project merely to facilitate financing. The individual units must independently demonstrate viability at the appraisal stage.

3. Electricity Generation Projects – Transmission and Evacuation Infrastructure

A second amendment has been made to paragraph 80. For electricity generation projects where the project scope includes both generation and transmission (evacuation infrastructure), the right-of-way requirement for the transmission component may be determined in accordance with sub-paragraph (3) of the relevant provision.

This clarification appears aimed at addressing the specific characteristics of power generation projects where transmission infrastructure is an integral part of the overall project scope. It provides greater clarity regarding the determination of right-of-way requirements for the transmission or evacuation component.

4. Key Regulatory Impact

The amendment is primarily a regulatory clarification and facilitation measure for project finance by commercial banks. Its principal significance lies in providing banks with greater discretion in structuring credit facilities for projects that can be broken down into multiple independently viable units.

At the same time, RBI has retained a clear prudential safeguard by requiring standalone viability to be assessed before financing each unit. This ensures that the flexibility introduced does not dilute the quality of credit appraisal.

The clarification relating to electricity generation projects should also assist banks in dealing with financing structures involving both generation capacity and associated transmission infrastructure.

5. Action Points for Banks

Banks should consider the following actions:

  1. Review existing project finance policies in light of the amended paragraph 78.
  2. Establish clear internal criteria for determining when a project can be treated as comprising multiple independent viable units.
  3. Ensure that standalone viability appraisal is undertaken ex-ante for every unit proposed to be financed separately.
  4. Review documentation and financial closure processes where separate project financing is adopted.
  5. Update credit appraisal and project finance manuals, wherever necessary.
  6. Review financing frameworks for electricity generation projects involving transmission/evacuation infrastructure to ensure compliance with the amended paragraph 80.
  7. Ensure that relevant credit, legal and project finance teams are made aware that the amendments are effective immediately.

Overall Assessment

The RBI amendment is a targeted measure aimed at providing greater flexibility in project financing without compromising prudential credit assessment. The ability to finance independently viable units as separate projects may facilitate more efficient financing of complex, multi-unit projects and potentially support phased project development.

For banks, however, the key compliance consideration is the requirement that each unit must be independently assessed for standalone viability before financing. The amendment therefore provides flexibility in financing structures, but does not relax the fundamental requirement of sound and independent credit appraisal.

The clarification concerning transmission/evacuation infrastructure in electricity generation projects is also likely to provide greater certainty in the appraisal and financing of power projects with integrated generation and transmission components. Overall, the amendment should be viewed as a facilitative change that enhances flexibility in project finance while preserving the underlying prudential discipline.

Saturday, 7 September 2019

external benchmark based lending

RBI circular dated 4th September, 2019 follows

As you are aware, Reserve Bank had constituted an Internal Study Group (ISG) to examine various aspects of the marginal cost of funds-based lending rate (MCLR) system. The final report of the ISG was published in October 2017 for public feedback. The ISG observed that internal benchmarks such as the Base rate/MCLR have not delivered effective transmission of monetary policy. The Study Group had, therefore, recommended a switchover to an external benchmark in a time-bound manner.
2. As a step in that direction, it was announced in the fifth bi-monthly Monetary Policy Statement for 2018-19 under ‘Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies’ dated December 05, 2018, that all new floating rate personal or retail loans and floating rate loans to Micro and Small Enterprises extended by banks from April 1, 2019 shall be linked to external benchmarks. Subsequently, it was announced in the first bi-monthly Monetary Policy Statement for 2019-20 under ‘Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies’ dated April 04, 2019 to hold further consultations with stakeholders and work out an effective mechanism for transmission of rates. Based on the consultations with stakeholders, it has now been decided to link all new floating rate personal or retail loans (housing, auto, etc.) and floating rate loans to Micro and Small Enterprises extended by banks with effect from October 01, 2019 to external benchmarks.
3. Accordingly, RBI instructions contained in Master Direction on Interest Rate on Advances issued vide DBR.Dir.No.85/13.03.00/2015-16 dated March 03, 2016 are amended as under:
3.1 The existing paragraph No. 7 of the aforesaid Master Direction stands replaced as under:
(a) All new floating rate personal or retail loans (housing, auto, etc.) and floating rate loans to Micro and Small Enterprises extended by banks from October 01, 2019 shall be benchmarked to one of the following:
 - Reserve Bank of India policy repo rate
 - Government of India 3-Months Treasury Bill yield published by the Financial Benchmarks India Private Ltd (FBIL)
- Government of India 6-Months Treasury Bill yield published by the FBIL
- Any other benchmark market interest rate published by the FBIL.
(b) Banks are free to offer such external benchmark linked loans to other types of borrowers as well.
(c) In order to ensure transparency, standardisation, and ease of understanding of loan products by borrowers, a bank must adopt a uniform external benchmark within a loan category; in other words, the adoption of multiple benchmarks by the same bank is not allowed within a loan category.
3.2 A new paragraph No.8(e) is added to the aforesaid Master Direction as given below:
Spread under External Benchmark
Banks are free to decide the spread over the external benchmark. However, credit risk premium may undergo change only when borrower’s credit assessment undergoes a substantial change, as agreed upon in the loan contract. Further, other components of spread including operating cost could be altered once in three years.
3.3 A new paragraph No. 9(ii) is added to the aforesaid Master Direction as given below:
Reset of Interest Rates under External Benchmark
The interest rate under external benchmark shall be reset at least once in three months.
3.4 A new paragraph No. 11(ii) is added to the aforesaid Master Direction as given below:
Transition to External Benchmark from MCLR/Base Rate/BPLR
Existing loans and credit limits linked to the MCLR/Base Rate/BPLR shall continue till repayment or renewal, as the case may be.
Provided that floating rate term loans sanctioned to borrowers who, in terms of extant guidelines, are eligible to prepay a floating rate loan without pre-payment charges, shall be eligible for switchover to External Benchmark without any charges/fees, except reasonable administrative/ legal costs. The final rate charged to this category of borrowers, post switchover to external benchmark, shall be same as the rate charged for a new loan of the same category, type, tenor and amount, at the time of origination of the loan.
Provided that other existing borrowers shall have the option to move to External Benchmark at mutually acceptable terms.
Provided that the switch-over shall not be treated as a foreclosure of existing facility.
4. The existing paragraph No. 2 of the aforesaid Master Direction is applicable for Small Finance Banks and Local Area Banks and the para is amended accordingly.
5. The existing paragraph No. 3(a)(iv) of the aforesaid Master Direction stands amended as under:
External benchmark rate means the reference rate which includes:
  1. Reserve Bank of India policy Repo Rate
  2. Government of India 3-Months and 6-Months Treasury Bill yields published by Financial Benchmarks India Private Ltd (FBIL)
  3. Any other benchmark market interest rate published by FBIL.
6. Some of the sub-paragraphs of para 4(a) of the aforesaid Master Direction stands amended as given hereunder:
(ii) All floating rate loans, except those mentioned in Section 13, shall be priced with reference to the benchmark indicated in chapter III.
(iv) When the floating rate advances are linked to an internal benchmark rate, banks shall determine their actual lending rates by adding the components of spread to the internal benchmark rate.
(vi) Interest rates on fixed rate loans of tenor below 3 years shall not be less than the benchmark rate for similar tenor and shall be as per directions contained in Section 13(d)(v).
7. A new paragraph No. 4(a)(xi) is added to the aforesaid Master Direction as indicated below:
There shall be no lending below the benchmark rate for a particular maturity for all loans linked to that benchmark.
8. The existing paragraph No. 6(a)(i) of the aforesaid Master Direction stands amended as under:
All floating rate rupee loans sanctioned and renewed between July 1, 2010 and March 31, 2016 shall be priced with reference to the Base Rate which will be the internal benchmark for such purposes.
9. The existing paragraph No. 6(b)(i) of the aforesaid Master Direction stands amended as under:
All floating rate rupee loans sanctioned and renewed w.e.f. April 1, 2016 shall be priced with reference to the Marginal Cost of Funds based Lending Rate (MCLR) which will be the internal benchmark for such purposes subject to the provisions contained in paragraph 7 of this Master Direction.
10. A new paragraph No. 9 (i)(d) is added to the aforesaid Master Direction as indicated below:
The periodicity of the reset under MCLR shall correspond to the tenor/maturity of the MCLR to which the loan is linked.
11. The following part of the sub-paragraphs (a), (b), (c) of para 13 of the aforesaid Master Direction as indicated hereunder stands deleted:
“shall be exempted from being linked to Base rate/MCLR as the benchmark for determining interest rate’’
12. The following part of the paragraph 13(d) of the aforesaid Master Direction as indicated hereunder stands deleted:
“shall be priced without being linked to Base rate/MCLR as the benchmark for determining interest rate’’

SEBI Settlement Regulations Amendment - Proposed

 Decisions taken by SEBI at its Board meeting held on 24th September, 2026 1. Overall regulatory significance The proposed SEBI (Settlement...